"Major news outlets are broadly unreliable and should not be trusted."
What's actually true
Major news outlets make mistakes and can frame stories selectively, but that doesn’t mean everything they report is fabricated. A factual report, an opinion column, and a cable-news argument aren’t the same thing. The strongest way to judge a story is to check its evidence, whether independent reporting supports it, and whether the outlet corrects errors.
Where they have a point
Sensational headlines, selective coverage, and real reporting failures give people legitimate reasons to be skeptical. Trust should be earned—not demanded because a familiar logo is on the screen.
Say this (15 seconds)
I get why you’re skeptical—news outlets do get things wrong. But ‘all fake’ goes too far. I’d rather check the specific story: what’s the evidence, and does it hold up?
Then ask
What would a news outlet need to do to earn your trust?
Sources
Pass the gravy (exit line)
Anyway, I’m ready to stop fact-checking the news and start investigating dessert.